Trading tools, tested and written up by the people who actually use them.

Alertsify

SPY and QQQ Today: October 6, 2026 Recap and the Day Before the Minutes

I’m Jake. Tuesday’s session is in the books, and tomorrow has a High-impact item on the calendar at 2:00pm ET. This recap covers what the two big index ETFs did today, then spends most of its time on something I think about the day before any scheduled event: what a short-dated option costs before the release versus after it.

What SPY and QQQ did on Tuesday

SPY opened at 778.15, traded between 777.96 and 781.62, and closed at 779.09. Monday’s close was 774.83, so the day finished up 4.26 points, or 0.55%. It gapped up at the open and never traded back below Monday’s high of 776.61. It ran to 781.62, then faded, closing 2.53 below the high but still above the open. The close is higher than every close from September 17 through October 5.

QQQ opened at 760.54, with a high of 762.86 and a low of 759.10, and closed at 759.66. Monday’s close was 756.20, so that is up 3.46 points, or 0.46%. It also gapped up and stayed above Monday’s high of 756.92. The difference is the finish: QQQ closed near the low of the day and below its open, a red candle body on a green day. Its close is also higher than every close from September 17 through October 5.

Put together, that is two straight sessions at new multi-week closing highs for both funds, with SPY holding more of its intraday gain than QQQ. That is a description of what printed, nothing more. Tuesday’s calendar also had the Trade Balance (forecast -100.8B, previous -88.6B), RCM/TIPP Economic Optimism (forecast 44.5, previous 45.6), and remarks from Bowman and Schmid. I’m listing them as scheduled items only, and I’m not tying any of them to the price action.

A gap-up open is not a free entry

Both funds gapped up and both faded from the high. If you bought the open in SPY, you were buying 778.15 with the day’s high still ahead at 781.62, and you were also holding through a 2.53 pullback from that high. If you bought QQQ at its open of 760.54, you finished the day underwater, because it closed at 759.66.

That is the reminder from today. A gap is a price that already moved without you. Chasing it means your entry is set by the open’s excitement instead of by a plan, and your exit has no logic behind it either. The open is a poor place to improvise.

The day before a scheduled event

Here is the part that is specific to tonight. On Wednesday, October 7 at 2:00pm ET, the FOMC Meeting Minutes are scheduled. It is flagged High impact, and there is no forecast figure for it. Earlier that day: Crude Oil Inventories at 10:30am (forecast 2.1M, previous 0.9M), a 10-year bond auction at 1:01pm, and Consumer Credit at 3:00pm (forecast 14.4B, previous 18.1B). Thursday has Unemployment Claims at 8:30am (forecast 200K, previous 197K), Waller at 4:30am, a 30-year bond auction at 1:01pm, and Musalem at 1:40pm. Friday has Preliminary University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment at 10:00am (forecast 47.6, previous 47.8). I’m not predicting any of these.

What I do think about is how options get priced around dates like these. Implied volatility is the market’s pricing of how much a contract might move, and it tends to be bid up into scheduled events, because everyone can see the date and wants exposure or protection. After the event passes and the uncertainty resolves, implied volatility can fall. That is a general pattern, not a rule, and it does not always happen.

The practical effect for someone holding a short-dated SPY or QQQ contract is that two things can move the price at once. One is the underlying fund moving. The other is the volatility component deflating. You can be right on direction and still see the contract lose value if the volatility premium you paid shrinks faster than the move helps you.

So the price you pay the day before a scheduled release is not the same as the price after, even if the fund sits at the same level. Tonight, a contract that expires this week carries the event inside it. Whether that is acceptable depends on size, expiration, and how much you can afford to lose on the position, which for a bought option is the entire premium.

Why I prefer a concrete alert to improvising

I started trading in a way that looked a lot like today’s gap chase. My own history, plainly: Year 1: lost $11,400. Year 2: broke even. Year 3-6: profitable. The change was not a better prediction. It was having defined entries, defined exits, and a size I had decided on before the market opened.

That is what an Alertsify alert gives you in practice: a specific contract, an entry, and an exit plan laid out before you act, so you are not working out volatility pricing and timing in the middle of a fast open. You can copy the trade as written, or you can pass on it. Either way you are comparing a plan against a plan instead of reacting to a candle.

Copied trades can lose money, and some will. An alert does not remove the volatility effect described above; it just puts the contract and the terms in front of you in advance. Position size is still your decision, and no result from any past trade is a promise about the next one.


Curious how mirroring works on a real account? The 7-day free trial connects your account so you can check the fills yourself.

Start the 7-day free trial →

Disclosure: that’s an affiliate link — I may earn a commission if you sign up for a paid plan, at no extra cost to you. There’s a free trial if you want to look around first.

Full risk disclosure


Related reading